FDABridge
← Retour au blog
Général

FDA 이야기 #002 — 베트남 수산물 공장이 14개월간 등록을 잃었다는 사실을 몰랐다

베스트셀러 보습제의 SPF 15 표시는 미국에서 화장품이 아니라는 것을 의미했습니다. 일반의약품이었습니다. 의약품 등록이 없었습니다.

Équipe FDABridge1 janv. 20263 min de lecture

A cosmetics company based in Istanbul had built a strong brand across Turkey, the Gulf states, and parts of Eastern Europe. They made high-quality skincare — moisturizers, serums, cleansers, eye creams. When a US distributor approached them about entering the American market, they assumed the process was similar to what they had done in the EU: register the facility, list the products, comply with labeling rules.

They were right about most of their product line. But one product — their bestselling daily moisturizer — had a problem they never anticipated.

문제

The moisturizer contained SPF 15 sun protection. In Turkey and the EU, sunscreens are cosmetics. In the United States, any product with an SPF claim is an over-the-counter drug regulated under the FDA's sunscreen monograph (21 CFR Part 352). This is not a technicality. It is one of the most fundamental classification differences between US and EU cosmetics regulation.

As a drug, the moisturizer required drug establishment registration under 21 CFR Part 207, an NDC Labeler Code, drug product listing in SPL format, a Drug Facts panel on the label (not a cosmetic ingredient list), compliance with the OTC sunscreen monograph for active ingredients and concentrations, and annual user fees under GDUFA. The company had none of these.

해결

We classified their entire product portfolio — 23 SKUs — and identified which products were cosmetics under MoCRA and which crossed into drug territory. The SPF moisturizer was the only drug. We gave them two options: remove the SPF claim and reformulate as a cosmetic moisturizer, or register as a drug establishment and list the product as an OTC drug. They chose to drop the SPF claim for the US market and reformulate with a non-SPF version. We then registered their facility under MoCRA, listed all 22 remaining cosmetic products, and reviewed their labels for US compliance.

만약 그랬다면

If they had shipped the SPF moisturizer to the US as a cosmetic, the product would have been an unapproved new drug — one of the most serious violations in the FDA's enforcement framework. The FDA routinely issues Warning Letters for this exact scenario, and Warning Letters are published on FDA's public database, searchable by any potential US buyer. A single product with the wrong classification could have poisoned their entry into the entire US market.

If you sell skincare, haircare, or personal care products and you are not sure whether any of them are drugs in the United States, that is the first question to answer — before you register anything. Visit fdabridge.com/cosmetics or fdabridge.com/drug.

Besoin d'aide pour la suite ?

Need help choosing a service?

Compare the main service options and choose the filing path that fits your product category.

À lire aussi

Articles connexes

Général

Symboles de marquage des dispositifs médicaux: Ce que les fabricants étrangers doivent savoir pour entrer sur le marché américain

28 avr. 2026

L'étiquetage des dispositifs médicaux aux États-Unis nécessite des symboles spécifiques pour une bonne communication. Les fabricants étrangers doivent comprendre les normes de symboles acceptées par la FDA avant d'exporter les appareils sur le marché américain.

Lire la suite →
Général

Enregistrement des dispositifs médicaux pour les fabricants étrangers: Un guide du système de réglementation américain

26 mars 2026

Les fabricants étrangers de dispositifs médicaux doivent enregistrer leurs établissements, répertorier leurs dispositifs et, selon la classe de dispositifs, obtenir l'approbation ou l'approbation de la FDA avant de les distribuer aux États-Unis.

Lire la suite →
Général

Dix questions à se poser avant d'embaucher un consultant de la FDA

24 mai 2026

Le choix d'un fournisseur de services de conformité de la FDA est une décision conséquente. Ces dix questions aident les fabricants étrangers à séparer les consultants compétents de ceux qui vont créer des problèmes qu'ils ne peuvent pas résoudre.

Lire la suite →